Does CNN stand for "Corrupt News Network"? It might as well, considering a blatant propaganda effort that has been uncovered by The Chicago Tribune. Rahm Emanuel, the Mayor of Chicago, is a man with limitless ambition, high intelligence, and utter ruthlessness. With little doubt, he has his eye on the Oval Office, and because he has served as Chief of Staff to President Obama and also served in the Clinton White House, he knows the ins and outs of the presidency. There is just one little problem: Chicago is in deep trouble, facing a fiscal black hole, wracked by levels of violence that make Iraq look good, and unable to get much help from the state of Illinois which has its own serious problems.
photo from CNN via Chicago Tribune
But, if his image is managed carefully with the help of media friends, he can be portrayed as heroic, facing the issues and helping people. And CNN seems to have signed up with that effort to produce a President Emanuel.
Tthe Chicago Tribune, through an open records request, reviewed emails (some of them redacted) between City Hall on the production company that made the CNN series "Chicagoland." Bill Ruthhart of the Tribune writes:
The producers come from an outfit named Brick City TV, which "teamed up with actor and producer Robert Redford and Laura Michalchyshyn's Sundance Productions to pitch the 'Chicagoland' project to CNN." All very incetstuous:
The team got access through friendly channels:
And everyone stood to benefit. One hand washes the other:
The very origin of the series lies with a PR effort on the part of Mayor Emanuel's team:
An example of the fawning emails sent by CNN:
One of the major issues recently faced by Emanuel is the closing of over 50 schools for budgetary reasons. Not a happy process, and one that generated much protest. So how did the documentary handle it?
The producers even consulted the mayor's office over their PR releases:
To be fair, a certain degree of cajoling is necessary int he first place to get access:
True enough. But by offering to polish Emanuel's image and by the editorial choices made to carry out that offer, this effort has degenerated into blatant propaganda. I have not watched the series, but Chicagoan Ed Lasky, who started to watch, comments, "I stopped watching after 2 episodes -- it was boring and repetitive and clearly biased to present a sensitive, empathetic and supremely effective Emanuel. It was clearly a snow job. The producers could have presented a much more realistic view of Chicago: corruption, fudging of crime stats to make Emanuel look better, racial politics, a blue city dying via liberalism.
Does CNN stand for "Corrupt News Network"? It might as well, considering a blatant propaganda effort that has been uncovered by The Chicago Tribune.
Rahm Emanuel, the Mayor of Chicago, is a man with limitless ambition, high intelligence, and utter ruthlessness. With little doubt, he has his eye on the Oval Office, and because he has served as Chief of Staff to President Obama and also served in the Clinton White House, he knows the ins and outs of the presidency. There is just one little problem: Chicago is in deep trouble, facing a fiscal black hole, wracked by levels of violence that make Iraq look good, and unable to get much help from the state of Illinois which has its own serious problems.
photo from CNN via Chicago Tribune
But, if his image is managed carefully with the help of media friends, he can be portrayed as heroic, facing the issues and helping people. And CNN seems to have signed up with that effort to produce a President Emanuel.
Tthe Chicago Tribune, through an open records request, reviewed emails (some of them redacted) between City Hall on the production company that made the CNN series "Chicagoland." Bill Ruthhart of the Tribune writes:
The producers come from an outfit named Brick City TV, which "teamed up with actor and producer Robert Redford and Laura Michalchyshyn's Sundance Productions to pitch the 'Chicagoland' project to CNN." All very incetstuous:
The team got access through friendly channels:
And everyone stood to benefit. One hand washes the other:
The very origin of the series lies with a PR effort on the part of Mayor Emanuel's team:
An example of the fawning emails sent by CNN:
One of the major issues recently faced by Emanuel is the closing of over 50 schools for budgetary reasons. Not a happy process, and one that generated much protest. So how did the documentary handle it?
The producers even consulted the mayor's office over their PR releases:
To be fair, a certain degree of cajoling is necessary int he first place to get access:
True enough. But by offering to polish Emanuel's image and by the editorial choices made to carry out that offer, this effort has degenerated into blatant propaganda. I have not watched the series, but Chicagoan Ed Lasky, who started to watch, comments, "I stopped watching after 2 episodes -- it was boring and repetitive and clearly biased to present a sensitive, empathetic and supremely effective Emanuel. It was clearly a snow job. The producers could have presented a much more realistic view of Chicago: corruption, fudging of crime stats to make Emanuel look better, racial politics, a blue city dying via liberalism. FOLLOW US ON
About Us |Contact |Privacy Policy |RSS Syndication
Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1gX2s05
Source : http://ift.tt/1gX2s05
No comments:
Post a Comment